largely a Milner Group measure in conception, formation, and execution. The influence
of the two groups is not readily apparent from the lists of Governors-general (Viceroys)
and Secretaries of State for India in the twentieth century:
Viceroys
Lord Curzon, 1898-1905
Lord Minto, 1905-1910
Lord Hardinge of Penshurst, 1910-1916
Lord Chelmsford, 1916-1921
Lord Reading, 1921-1926
Lord Irwin, 1926-1931
Lord Willingdon, 1931-1936
Lord Linlithgow, 1936-1943
Secretaries of State
Lord George Hamilton, 1895-1903
St. John Brodrick, 1903-1908
John Morley, 1908-1910
Lord Crewe, 1910-1915
Austen Chamberlain, 1915-1917
Edward Montagu, 1917-1922
Lord Peel, 1922-1924
Lord Olivier, 1924
Lord Birkenhead, 1924-1928
Lord Peel, 1928-1929
Wedgwood Benn, 1929-1931
Samuel Hoare, 1931-1935
Lord Zetland, 1935-1940
Leopold Amery, 1940-1945
Of the Viceroys only one (Reading) is clearly of neither the Cecil Bloc nor the Milner
Group; two were members of the Milner Group (Irwin and Willingdon); another was a
member of both groups (Chelmsford); the rest were of the Cecil Bloc, although in two
cases (Minto and Linlithgow) in a rather peripheral fashion. Three of the eight were
members of All Souls. According to Lord Esher, the appointment of Lord Hardinge in
1910 was made at his suggestion, by John Morley. At the time, Esher's son, the present
Viscount Esher, was acting as unpaid private secretary to Morley, a position he held for
five years (1905-1910). From the same source we learn that the Viceroyship was offered
to Selborne in 1903 and to Esher himself in 1908. The former failed of appointment
because Curzon refused to retire, while the latter rejected the post as of too limited
influence.
Of the thirteen Secretaries of State, two were Labour and two Liberals. One of these
latter (Morley) was close to the Milner Group. Of the other nine, three were of the Cecil
Bloc (St. John Brodrick, Austen Chamberlain, and Lord Zetland), two were of the Milner
Group (Hoare and Amery), and four were of neither group.
The political and constitutional history of India in the twentieth century consists
largely of a series of investigations by various committees and commissions, and a
second, and shorter, series of legislative enactments. The influence of the Milner Group
can be discerned in both of these, especially in regard to the former.
Of the important commissions that investigated Indian constitutional questions in the
twentieth century, every one has had a member of the inner circle of the Milner Group.
The following list gives the name of the commission, the dates of its existence, the
number of British members (in distinction from Indian members), the names of
representatives from the Cecil Bloc and Milner Group (with the latter italicized), and the
command number of its report:
1. The Royal Commission on Decentralization in India, 1907-1909, five members
including
2. The Royal Commission on Public Services in India, 1912-1915, nine members
including Baron Islington, the Earl of Ronaldshay (later Marquess of Zetland), Sir
Valentine Chirol, and
was later father-in-law to Sir Edward Grigg (Lord Altrincham) (Cmd. 8382 of 1916).
3. The Government of India Constitutional Reform Committee on Franchise, 1919,
four members, including
4. The Government of India Constitutional Reform Committee on
Functions, 1919, four members, including
5. The Joint Select Committee on the Government of India Bill, 1919, fourteen
members, including
Islington, Sir Henry Craik (whose son was in Milner's Kindergarten), and
6. The Committee on Home Administration of Indian Affairs, 1919, eight members,
including
7. The Royal Commission on Superior Civil Services in India, 1923-1924, five
members, including Lord Lee of Fareham as chairman and
2128 of 1924).
8. The Indian Statutory Commission, 1927-1930, seven members, with
as chairman (Cmd. 3568 and 3569 of 1930).
9. The Indian Franchise Committee, 1931-1932, eight members, including
in Milner's Kindergarten) (Cmd. 4086 of 1932).
10. The three Indian Round Table Conferences of 1930-1932 contained a number of
members of the Milner Croup. The first session (November 1930-January 1931) had
eighty-nine delegates, sixteen from Britain, sixteen from the Indian States, and fifty-
seven from British India. Formed as they were by a Labour government, the first two
sessions had eight Labour members among the sixteen from Britain. The other eight were