Government are the following: (a) The Allied Governments cannot acquiesce in any

further attack on Finland by either the Soviet or German Governments. In the event

therefore, of such an attack taking place, any refusal by the Swedish Government to

facilitate the efforts of the Allied Governments to come to the assistance of Finland in

whatever manner they may think fit, and still more any attempt to prevent such assistance

would be considered by the Allied Governments as endangering their vital interests.... (c)

Any attempt by the Soviet Government to obtain from Norway a footing on the Atlantic

sea-board would be contrary to the vital interests of the Allied Governments."

The Swedish Foreign Minister expressed his government's astonishment at this note

and its determination to decide such questions for itself and to preserve Sweden's

neutrality in the future as it had been preserved in the past.(20)

It is not clear what was the attitude of the Milner Group toward this effort to open

active hostilities against the Soviet Union while remaining technically in a state of war

with Germany. Halifax was still at the Foreign Office and apparently actively concerned

in this project. The Times was wholeheartedly in favor of the plan. On 5 March, for

example, it said of the Finnish war: "It is becoming clearer every day that this war is no

side issue. Finland is defending more than the cause of liberty and more than her own

soil.... Our own cause is being buttressed by her resistance to the evil of tyranny.... Our

interest is clear and there is a moral issue involved as well as the material. The whole

sentiment of this country demands that Finland should not be allowed to fall."

The Round Table, in the only issue which appeared during the Finnish troubles, had a

propagandist article on "The Civilization of Finland." It called Finland "one of the most

democratic nations, on any definition, in all Europe." The rest of the article was a paean

of praise for the kind and magnanimous conduct of the Finnish government in every

crisis of its history from 1917, but nothing was said about the Finnish war, nor was there

any mention of Allied aid.

During this period the Milner Group became increasingly impatient with the

Chamberlain group. This was clear from the June 1940 issue of The Round Table, which

criticized the Cabinet reshuffle of April as evoking"almost universal derision." It also

criticized Chamberlain's failure to include able members of his own party in the Cabinet.

This may have been a reference to Amery's continued exclusion. The article said: "This

lack of imagination and courage could be seen in almost every aspect of the Chamberlain

Government's conduct of the war." It excluded Simon and Hoare as possible prime

ministers, on the ground that they were too close to Chamberlain. It was probably

thinking of Halifax as prime minister, but, when the time came, others thought him, also,

to be too closely associated with appeasement. On the crucial day, 8 May 1940, the

Group was badly split. In fact, on the division that preceded Chamberlain's resignation,

Lady Astor voted against the government, while her brother-in-law, John Jacob Astor,

voted with the government. The debate was one of the most bitter in recent history and

reached its high point when Amery cried out to the Government benches the words of

Cromwell: "You have sat too long here for any good you have been doing. Depart, I say,

and let us have done with you. In the name of God, go!" In the ensuing division, the

whips were on with a vengeance, but the government's majority was only 81, more than a

hundred Conservatives abstaining from voting. Most of the Milner Group members, since

they held offices in the government, had to vote with it. Of the inner core, only Amery

and Lady Astor broke away. In the majority, still supporting Chamberlain, were J. J.

Astor, Grigg, Hoare, Malcolm MacDonald, Salter, Simon' and Somervell. But the fight

had been too bitter. Chamberlain was replaced by Churchill, and Amery came to office

(as Secretary of State for India). Once again the Milner Group and the government were

united on the issues. Both, from 8 May 1940, had only one aim: to win the war with

Germany.

Chapter 13—The Second World War, 1939-1945

The Milner Group played a considerable role in the Second World War, not scattered

throughout the various agencies associated with the great struggle, but concentrated in

four or five chief fiefs. Among these were: (1) the Research and Intelligence Department

of the Foreign Office; (2) the British Embassy in Washington; (3) the Ministry of

Information; and (4) those agencies concerned with economic mobilization and economic

reconstruction. Considering the age of most of the inner core of the Milner Group during

the Second World War (the youngest, Lothian, was 57 in 1939; Hichens was 65; Brand

was 61; Dawson was 65; and Curtis was 67), they accomplished a great deal. Unable, in

Перейти на страницу:

Поиск

Нет соединения с сервером, попробуйте зайти чуть позже