The GDR rulers adopted this policy without backing from Moscow, which in the wake of Stalin’s death was reassessing the advisability of trying to impose a fully socialized economy on East Germany. Worried that the East German state was failing as a countermodel to the West, Stalin’s successors, most notably Minister for State Security Lavrenti Beria, proposed a “New Course” for the GDR that called for a suspension of agricultural collectivization and forcefed industrialization. It might seem odd that Beria should have advocated this softer line, for as head of the dreaded NKVD (Soviet secret political police) he had been Stalin’s chief hatchet man, helping the Great Leader to purge countless enemies, real and imagined. Yet he was also a realist with a full appreciation for the damage that Stalin’s policies had done, not least in East Germany. Because Ulbricht was so closely identified with the hard line, he seemed unlikely to be willing to abandon it. Beria thus began thinking about replacing the SED chief with one of the latter’s critics in the East German Politbüro, either Wilhelm Zaisser (minister for state security), or Rudolf Herrnstadt (editor of
Ulbricht stood his ground. Aware that his enemies were plotting against him both in Moscow and Berlin, the SED chief coupled his own survival with resisting Beria’s New Course. On June 16, 1953, his government announced another 25 percent increase in work norms, along with a warning that workers who failed to meet state quotas could expect pay cuts of up to 35 percent. Stalin might be dead in Moscow, but his German alter ego was alive and well in East Berlin.
Just as alive, however, was a strong current of resentment among the chief victims of Ulbricht’s policies, the workers of East Germany. The frustration had been building for some time. On June 13, 1953, during a cruise on the Spree, a group of construction workers decided to call a protest strike. At about nine o’clock in the morning on June 16 workers at the Stalinallee, East Berlin’s prestige construction project, threw down their tools and began marching toward the House of Ministries (Göring’s former Luftwaffe headquarters) in the Leipziger Strasse. On the way they picked up hundreds more demonstrators from other construction sites and factories. In addition to carrying banners reading “We Demand a Lowering of Norms,” some of the marchers called for free elections and the resignation of the current government. “Goatee [Ulbricht], belly [Pieck], and glasses [Grotewohl] are not the will of the masses!” they screamed. Upon arriving at their destination they shouted for goatee and glasses to come out and face the workers of the “workers’ state.”
Ulbricht and Grotewohl had plenty of experience talking
The gesture came too late. Sensing that they had the government on the run, leaders of the demonstration called for a general strike to begin the following morning. People were instructed to assemble at Strausberger Platz on the Stalinallee. There was, however, no unified or coherent understanding as to what the strike would yield: some simply wanted economic reforms, others apparently hoped for the ouster of Ulbricht and company, while still others seem to have envisaged the end of Communist rule and the reunification of Germany. As the protesters finally left the Ministries building on the night of June 16, no one was certain whether there would be a strike at all on the following day.
Fearing the worst, the government banned any discussion of the protest in the state-run media, but RIAS in West Berlin gave a full account of the demonstration and call to action, without explicitly endorsing it. As it turned out, RIAS did not have to provide an endorsement. Despite cold rain and a suspension of public transport, thousands of workers began assembling at Strausberger Platz on the morning of June 17. Demonstrators gathered in other GDR cities and towns as well. All told, almost 400,000 workers threw in with the strike. The first—and, until 1989, the only—uprising against Communist rule in East Germany was about to begin.