The implication is that this
today, except Antarctica, is free from war. There are from 25 to 40
military struggles going on somewhere every day of the year.
There have been more than 150 armed conflicts since the end of World War II with the death count already in excess of 20 million and rising.1 We cannot help noticing that this
THE NEW ALCHEMY
The alchemists of ancient times vainly sought the philosophers'
stone which they believed would turn lead into gold. Is it possible that such a stone actually has been found? Can it be that the money alchemists of our own time have learned how to transmute war into debt, and debt into war, and
In a previous section, we theorized a strategy, dubbed the Rothschild Formula, in which the world's money cabal deliberately encourages war as a means of stimulating the profitable production of armaments and of keeping nations perpetually in debt. This is not profit seeking, it is
ITEM: In his address to the graduating class at Annapolis in 1983, Secretary of the Navy, John Lehman, said: "Within weeks, many of you will be looking across just hundreds of feet of water at some of the most modern technology ever invented in America.
Unfortunately, it is on Soviet ships."
As Professor Sutton observed in his book,
systems that our State Department could have kept out of Soviet hands. Sutton concludes: "The technical capability to wage the 1- These figures are taken from United Nations publication E/CN.5/1985/Rev.l, 1985
304 THE CREATURE FROM JEKYLL ISLAND
Korean and Vietnamese wars originated
ITEM: That leads us to the more recent wars in the Middle East and the rise of "Islamic Fundamentalism." Iran, Iraq, Syria, Algeria, the PLO, the Muslim Brotherhood, and similar anti-American groupings have all received weapons, funding, and clandestine support from the U.S. government. In the Gulf War, every effort was made to insure that Hussein's regime was contained but not destroyed (shades of the Korean and Vietnam wars). Most of his bacterial-weapons factories were spared. After the cease fire, he was allowed to keep his fleet of helicopter gunships, which he promptly used to put down a large-scale internal revolt.
The big pill to swallow is that Saddam Hussein has been an asset to the global planners in the West, and they have done everything possible to keep him in power. This strategy has lately become so obvious that there is no longer any serious attempt to conceal it. The task now is how to explain it to the gullible public so as to make it sound like a good idea.
As mentioned previously, the think-tank and talent pool for the implementation of this strategy has been the Council on Foreign Relations. In 1996, the Managing Editor of the CFR's monthly journal,
Yes, it's tempting to get rid of Saddam. But his bad behavior actually serves America's purposes in the region.... If Saddam Hussein did not exist, we would have to invent him.... The end of Saddam Hussein would be the end of the anti-Saddam coalition.
Nothing destroys an alliance like the disappearance of the enemy..-.
Maintaining a long-term American presence in the gulf would be difficult in the absence of a regional threat.2