Her judge glances left and right at his colleagues. Is she imagining it, or does the flicker of a smile pass among them, and a whispered word? What is the word?
He turns back to her. 'Thank you. That is all.You will hear from us in due course.'
'That is all?'
'That is all, for today.'
'I am not confused.'
'Yes, you are not confused. But who is it who is not confused?'
They cannot contain themselves, her panel of judges, her board. First they titter like children, then abandon all dignity and howl with laughter.
• * *
She wanders across the square. It is, she would guess, early afternoon. There is less bustle than usual. The locals must be at their siesta.
The sun is fierce. She ought to be wearing a hat. But her hat is in the bunkhouse, and the thought of re-entering that airless space repels her.
The courthouse scene has not left her, the ignominy of it, the shame. Yet beneath it all she remains, strangely, under the spell of the frogs. Today, it would appear, she is disposed to believe in frogs. What will it be tomorrow? Midges? Grasshoppers? The objects of her belief appear to be quite random. They come up without warning, surprising and even, despite her dark mood, delighting her.
She gives the frogs a tap with her fingernail. The tone that comes back is clear, clear as a bell.
She gives the word
The sound that
Astonishing that a court which sets itself up as an interrogatory of belief should refuse to pass her. They must have heard other writers before, other disbelieving believers or believing disbelievers. Writers are not lawyers, surely they must allow for that, allow for eccentricities of presentation. But of course this is not a court of law. Not even a court of logic. Her first impression was right: a court out of Kafka or
She is before the gate again, before what is evidently her gate and hers alone, though it must be visible to anyone who cares to give it a glance. It is, as ever, closed, but the door to the lodge is open, and inside she can see the gatekeeper, the custodian, busy as usual with his papers, which ripple lightly in the air from the fan.
'Another hot day,' she remarks.
'Mm,' he mumbles, not interrupting his work.
'Every time I pass by I see you writing,' she continues, trying not to be deterred. 'You are a writer too, in a sense. What are you writing?'
'Records. Keeping the records up to date.'
'I've just had my second hearing.'
'That's good.'
'I sang for my judges. I was today's singing-bird. Do you use that expression:
He shakes his head abstractedly: no.
'It did not go well, I'm afraid, my song.'
'Mm.'
'I know you are not a judge,' she says. 'Nevertheless, in your judgement, do I stand any chance of passing through? And if I do not pass through, if I am deemed not good enough to pass, will I stop here for ever, in this place?'
He shrugs. 'We all stand a chance.' He has not looked up, not once. Does that mean something? Does it mean that he has not the courage to look her in the eye?
'But as a writer,' she persists – 'what chance do I stand as a writer, with the special problems of a writer, the special fidelities?'
He shrugs again. 'Who can say,' he says. 'It is a matter for the boards.'
'But you keep the records – who passes through, who does not. You must, in a sense, know.'