were granted the landed immigrant status in response to our humanitarian appeal 1 (one) year ago.

In the same time some opponents of this decision did not ceased their pressure. They did not want to allow us to receive the landed

immigrant's papers. In attempts to put us down they started to destroy me, my family, ours lives before we could receive the status in

Canada. Each routine immigration procedure - extension of the employment or student authorization, etc. - turned into a mockery

and humiliation. We must fight for every small thing, which has to be proceeded automatically! Especially after we were given the

Certificat de selectione du Quebec: more then eight (8) months ago. Unnecessary expensive medical exams (Immigration has

pretended that lost our medical data) and other innumerous humiliations made our life unbearable. They combined my mother's

and mine cases in Immigration's computer, when in reality my mother's case has nothing to do with our case. (She's a sponsored

spouse of a Canadian citizen - since November 1998, - and we were accepted by the humanitarian appeal). Immigration officer

Madam Helene ROY illegally intervened in the medical issues to torpid my mother's case, and on her request Mrs. W. BRZEZINSKA

(M.D.) made a false report before my mother's medical evaluation for Immigration took place. Madame ROY refused to recognize

my mother's marriage "because of the medical concerns" the next day suddenly replacing this negative decision by another one.

When I called Immigration about my case, I was told three times that our case is frozen because of my mother's situation.

Immigration was concerned about a possibility of eventual diseases, which my mother could develop. Theoretically every person,

even the most healthy, could develop any terminal disease - and will develop: because everybody dies. Immigration's demands on

ground of a "potential danger of developing a terminal disease" are ridiculous and became a ground of discrimination, partiality and

abuse. A number of facts revealed that one of their goals was to put my mother under a stress damaging her health as much as

possible.

They contacted the medical lab where my mother did a x-ray before she went there. Later confusion about that x-ray took place. In

January 2000 Immigration's medical committee ordered my mother to do additional tests: strum creatinine (blood test) and

echocardiogram. The "strum creatinine" test (testing the kidney function) was already done before and was in norm. Cardio function

was already tested - there were no concerns. There were no reasons for additional tests. The strum creatinine test was normal

again. The echocardiogram only reflected nothing but some anatomical abnormalities, known before. The doctor who did the test

told me that the abnormalities have anatomical, not pathological, nature. However, instead of proceeding my mother's documents

Immigration submitted her (June 28, 2000) another illogical demand: to send them a "resume" of her "last visit to cardiologist". She

never has visited a cardiologist and had nothing to send them! She went to Mr. Giannakis M.D. who was her physician for

Immigration. He sent her to Dr. Gordon Creenstein, a known authority in cardiology, who examined her and told her the same:

augmentation has the anatomical nature, it is not pathology. He submitted his rapport on 27 July 2000. Any impartial observer can

see that both kidney and heart "chapters" in that story were closed now. However, it was not enough for Immigration. On September

2000 Immigration's medical department made another ruling. They ordered my mom to have another urine test and then visit an

urologist. She did the test immediately - and the visit to urologist was scheduled for November. Even this did not satisfied

Immigration! On September 19 my mother received a letter from another Immigration officer, which demanded from her a statement

how she obeyed the last Immigration's order, and accused her of postponing and sabotaging the procedure. It was signed by L.

Cawchesne. Meanwhile Dr. Giannakis called Immigration and told that there was no reason for demanding a visit to an urologist:

because there was nothing abnormal in her urine test. They had no choice but to agree with him. He cancelled the appointment to

urologist because Immigration's medical division has finished working with her file - and informed the immigration officer that they

have no medical concerns about her any more. However, Immigration still did not make any decision, refusing to close my mother's

file and submit her the papers. Now they have no reasons at all, no excuses or explanations. One of my mother's immigration

counselors was refused a clear answer, another was refused a conversation. From my sources I know that her file is given to Rene

Jacque. There is no decision, no ruling. And my mother is in the limbo again. And I am told that my case is frozen because of my

mother's situation...

Перейти на страницу:

Похожие книги