Итог полностью

13 The most perfect illustration of this analysis can be found, thanks to the fine work done by Robert Darnion, in the history of that son of cultural revolution that the dominated figures within the emergent intellectual field - people such as Bnssot, Mercier. Desmoulins. Hebert, Marat, and so many others - carried out within the Revolutionary movement (destruction of the Academies, dispersion of the salons, suppression of pensions, abolition of privileges). This cultural revolution sprang from the status of ‘cultural pariahs* and its first priority was to attack the symbolic foundations of power, contributing, by its ‘politico-pornography* and its deliberately scatological lampoons, to the task of ‘delegitimation* which is doubtless one of the fundamental dimensions of revolutionary radicalism, (See R. Darnton, ‘The high Enlightenment and the low-life of literature in pre-revolutionary France’, Past and Present. 51 (1971), pp. 81-115; on the exemplary case of Marat, who, as people often forget, was also - or initially - a bad physicist, see also C. C. Gillispie. Science and Polity in France ar the End of the Old Regime (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 19 80). pp, 2 90-330.)

14 For a similar analysis of the relation between rhe kinship group ‘on paper* and the kinship group in practice as ‘will and representation*, see P. Bourdieu. Outline of a Theory of Practice, tr. R. Nice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977) and The Logic of Practice, tr. R. Nice (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990),

Note; Page references in italics indicate illustrative material.

absolutism 52,240 accent

and classification 221

and linguistic disposition 17 and social position 18, 264 n.28 acceptability 48,55,76-7,81-2,86 access

toeducation 64,277n.4

to legitimate language 56,97,109, 138 to political action 172-3,177, 197 to political representation 188

acquisition of legitimate language 18,61-2.81-2

action collective 127 field 14-17 and interest 16,127 political 127,171,190-1

adolescents, and resistance to language dominance 51-2,94-7

Adorno, T.W. 271 n. 12 adroitness 80 alienation 156-7, 204-5,219,249 alliances 245 anthropology, and dominance of linguistics 33-4,37

apparatchiks 209,213-14,216,217,219 apparatus

and delegates 216-19

and political field 196-7, 199-202,249 aristocracy 120-2,241

labour 245-6 aristocratism

academic 143-4,151

political 203

art, popular 213-14

asceticism 122-3

ascription, and achievement 124

assimilation, language 57,63-4,95

attentuation 84

attribution 121,124-5,269 n.2

Austin, J. L. 3,8-9. 73-4,107-15,125, 129

authenticity/inauthenticity 143, 149-50, 155

authoritarianism, and revolution 187, 202,285 n.52

authority

delegated 9,106,107-16,115

of discourse 152,155,190-1,223,227, 248

and institution 75-6,109-11

linguistic 1,9,41,57-61,69-71,73-6, 129

and naming 239-41

of politician 190-1, 194, 211-12

religious 290 n.7

symbolic H,106,221-2,266 n. 19

Axelos, Kostas 157

Bachelard, Gaston 146, 269 n.3

Bakhtin, Mikhail 40,88

Bakunin, Mikhail 174, 203, 280 nn.24,26

Bally, C. 79

Barthes, Roland 4

Bauche, Henri 93

Bayet,M. 207-8

Bearnais dialect 19,68-9, 78