35. David A. Mindell. Digital Apollo: Human and Machine in Spaceflight. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2011. Р. 20.
36. Wilbur Wright. Letter, 1900/ May 13. В книге: Visions of Technology: A Century of Vital Debate about Machines, Systems, and the Human World / Ed. Richard Rhodes. N.Y.: Touchstone, 1999. Р. 33.
37. Mindell. Digital Apollo. P. 20.
38. Там же. P. 21.
39. Wilbur Wright. Some Aeronautical Experiments // Speech before the Western Society of Engineers. 1901, September 18. UPL: http://www.wright-house.com/wright-brothers/Aeronautical.html.
40. Mindell. Digital Apollo. Р. 21.
41. J. O. Roberts. The Case against Automation in Manned Fighter Aircraft // SETP Quarterly Review 2. 1957. № 3. Р. 18–23.
42. Цитируется по: Mindell. Between Human and Machine. Р. 77.
43. Harris. Human Performance on the Flight Deck. Р. 221.
Глава четвертая. Эффект вырождения1. Alfred North Whitehead. An Introduction to Mathematics. N. Y.: Henry Holt, 1911. Р. 61.
2. Цитируется по: Frank Levy and Richard J. Murnane. The New Division of Labor: How Computers Are Creating the Next Job Market. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004. Р. 4.
3. Raja Parasuraman et al. Model for Types and Levels of Human Interaction with Automation // IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics – Part A: Systems and Humans 30, 2000. № 3 Р. 286–297. См. также: Nadine Sarter et al. Automation Surprises / Ed. Gavriel Salvendy // Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics., 2nd ed. N.Y.: Wiley, 1997.
4. Dennis F. Galletta et al. Does Spell-Checking Software Need a Warning Label? // Communications of the ACM 48. 2005. № 7. Р. 82–86.
5. National Transportation Safety Board // Marine Accident Report: Grounding of the Panamanian Passenger Ship Royal Majesty on Rose and Crown Shoal near Nantucket. Massachusetts, 1995. June 10.Washington, D.C.: NTSB, 1997. April 2.
6. Sherry Turkle. Simulation and Its Discontents. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2009. Р. 55–56.
7. Jennifer Langston. GPS Routed Bus under Bridge, Company Says // Seattle Post-Intelligencer, 2008. April 17.
8. A. A. Povyakalo et al. How to Discriminate between Computer-Aided and Computer-Hindered Decisions: A Case Study in Mammography // Medical Decision Making 33. 2013. № 1. January. Р. 98–107.
9. E. Alberdi et al. Why Are People’s Decisions Sometimes Worse with Computer Support? // Proceedings of SAFECOMP 2009, the 28th International Conference on Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security / Eds. Bettina Buth et al. Hamburg, Germany: Springer, 2009. Р. 18–31.
10. См.: Raja Parasuraman et al. Performance Consequences of Automation-Induced Complacency // International Journal of Aviation Psychology 3, 1993, № 1. Р. 1–23.
11. Raja Parasuraman and Dietrich H. Manzey. Complacency and Bias in Human Use of Automation: An Attentional Integration // Human Factors 52, 2010. June. № 3. Р. 381–410.
12. Norman J. Slamecka and Peter Graf. The Generation Effect: Delineation of a Phenomenon // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 4, 1978. № 6. Р. 592–604.
13. Jeffrey D. Karpicke and Janell R. Blunt. Retrieval Practice Produces More Learning than Elaborative Studying with Concept Mapping // Science 331, 2011. Р. 772–775.
14. Britte Haugan Cheng. Generation in the Knowledge Integration Classroom // PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley, 2008.
15. Simon Farrell and Stephan Lewandowsky. A Connectionist Model of Complacency and Adaptive Recovery under Automation // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26, 2000. № 2. Р. 395–410.
16. Я уже обсуждал работу ван Нимвегена в моей книге: The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains. N. Y.: W. W. Norton, 2010, Р. 214–216.