The influence of these ideas is felt in the growing self-assertiveness evinced by the residents of new settlements. As an editorial of 1909 proudly noted: “The life of these settlements is extremely original and absolutely does not fit within the limits of the concept of ‘dacha’ life in the narrow sense of this word.”98 Three years later, the leading dacha organ was more specific in identifying the change that had taken place: “Dacha life has ceased to be a whim and a luxury for rich people who used to leave the hurly-burly of the city for two or three months in order to relax in the open air, and at the present time it would be more accurate to describe dacha settlements in the Moscow region as suburban settlements.”99
These settlements, of which there were estimated to be several hundred in the Moscow
region alone in the early 1910s, set themselves a number of practical goals in the
early years of their existence: to improve rail links; to establish a regular police
presence and a fire-fighting force; to provide medical care and schools; to improve
sanitation; to plan and administer the territory of the settlement effectively; and,
on the political front, to establish a productive working relationship with local
councils (
“Settlers” (
Here a person can spend his private life in peace, satisfying his personal requirements and inclinations, without troubling himself or others. Everything takes on the imprint of his individuality, everything acquires the more enclosed, intimate character that is so valuable for concentrated and productive work, for the development of independence, self-awareness, and the cultural strength that follows from these.103
But the value of the exurban settlement was not conceived of only in individualistic
terms. Efforts were made to construct a new kind of collective spirit based on an
informed commitment to community life. Periodicals representing the settlements complained
of the unruly behavior of city dwellers who frequented the local theater and turned
it into a “cabaret” and “seedy bar,” and discussed the problem—one of acute public
concern in late imperial society—of thieves and “hooligans”; it also registered the
difficulty of harmonizing the interests of settlement dwellers (
Constraints on Exurbanization
Through little fault of their own, the settlements achieved only limited success. The practical obstacles they faced were enormous. Public transport systems developed so slowly and sporadically that the possibilities of decentralization were limited.105 Adna Weber, an influential pioneer of comparative urban geography, in 1899 identified four principal means of avoiding unacceptably high levels of urban concentration: a shorter workday, ownership associations for workers, cheap transit, rapid transit.106 As of 1917, Russia had achieved none of them.