MYERS. (
SIRWILFRID. (
JUDGE. I should like to see these letters to which you refer, Sir Wilfrid.
(SIR WILFRID
MYERS. (
JUDGE. No, Mr. Myers, the King against Potter, and it was reported in nineteen thirty-one. I appeared for the prosecution.
MYERS. And if my memory serves me well, your lordship’s similar objection was sustained.
JUDGE. Your memory for once serves you ill, Mr. Myers. My objection then was overruled by Mr. Justice Swindon—as yours is now, by me.
(MYERS
SIRWILFRID. (
USHER. (
POLICEMAN. (
JUDGE. If these letters are authentic it raises very serious issues. (
(
SIRWILFRID. Mrs. Heilger, you appreciate that you are still on your oath?
ROMAINE. Yes.
JUDGE. Romaine Heilger, you are recalled to this box so that Sir Wilfrid may ask you further questions.
SIRWILFRID. Mrs. Heilger, do you know a certain man whose Christian name is Max?
ROMAINE. (
SIRWILFRID. (
ROMAINE. Certainly not.
SIRWILFRID. You’re quite sure of that?
ROMAINE. I’ve never known anyone called Max. Never.
SIRWILFRID. And yet I believe it’s a fairly common Christian name, or contraction of a name, in your country. You mean that you have never known anyone of that name?
ROMAINE. (
SIRWILFRID. I shall not ask you to throw your mind back such a long way as that. A few weeks will suffice. Let us say—(
ROMAINE. (
SIRWILFRID. A letter.
ROMAINE. I don’t know what you’re talking about.
SIRWILFRID. I’m talking about a letter. A letter written on the seventeenth of October. You remember that date, perhaps.
ROMAINE. Not particularly, why?
SIRWILFRID. I suggest that on that day, you wrote a certain letter—a letter addressed to a man called Max.
ROMAINE. I did nothing of the kind. These are lies that you are telling. I don’t know what you mean.
SIRWILFRID. That letter was one of a series written to the same man over a considerable period of time.
ROMAINE. (
SIRWILFRID. You would seem to have been on—(
LEONARD. (
(
(