The nature of this deception was spelled out years later byCarter Glass in his book,
"It would be a pretense on its face," he said. "Was there ever agovernment note based primarily on the property of bankinginstitutions? Was there ever a government issue not one dollar ofwhich could be put out except by demand of a bank? Thesuggested government obligation is so remote it could never bediscovered."
To which the President replied: "Exactly so, Glass. Every wordyou say is true; the government liability
Years later, Paul Warburg would explain further:
While technically and legally the Federal Reserve note is an obligation of the United States Government, in reality it is an obligation, the sole actual responsibility for which rests on the reserve 1. Glass, pp. 124—25.
THE CREATURE SWALLOWS CONGRESS 467
banks.... The government could only be called upon to take them up after the reserve banks had failed.
Warburg's explanation should be carefully analyzed. It is anincredibly important statement. The man who masterminded theFederal Reserve System is telling us that
But let us return to the great deceit of 1913. The second demandmade by Bryan—political control over the System, not bankercontrol—was met with an equally beguiling "compromise." Inaddition to the governing board of regional bankers previouslyproposed, there now would be a central regulatory commission, to