Perhaps it was the devastation wrought during the Second World War that Ukraine should start

accepting as its own fault? Or maybe it was the eight decades of Moscow's strangulation of

Ukraine's economy that Ukraine has really no one to blame for but itself? Ukraine has so many

such calamities to choose from that it is impossible to guess - perhaps Mr. Safer would be kind

enough to simply tell us precisely which of them he thinks it is that Ukraine should be mature

enough to accept responsibility for having brought upon itself.

(18) Dividing Ukraine. 60 Minutes gave the impression that its story focussed solely on Western

Ukraine, when in fact a portion of it came from Central Ukraine. Rabbi Bleich's full title, for

example, is not "Chief Rabbi for the Ukraine," but rather "Rabbi of Kiev and Ukraine," (where

Kiev is in central Ukraine) and although 60 Minutes gave the impression that he was interviewed

in Lviv, he was in reality interviewed in Kiev. Similarly, while Mr. Safer was in the middle of

interviewing representatives of the Ukrainian Catholic church in Lviv and was saying "The

Cardinal's deputy, Monsignor Dacko, denies traditional anti-Semitism in the Ukraine....", the

viewer was being shown St. Volodymyr's cathedral which unlike Monsignor Dacko was in Kiev and

which unlike Monsignor Dacko is Orthodox rather than Catholic. I suppose that 60 Minutes

committed itself to the scene-setting introduction "... and the West, where we go tonight ...",

and then suppressed the Kiev origin of some of its material so as to give the story the

appearance of having a consistent locale; and perhaps as well 60 Minutes wished to restrict its

smearing to Western Ukrainians so as to promote divisions within the country.

(19) Freedom from slavery is too much freedom (for Ukrainians, anyway). The title of the 60

Minutes broadcast, "The Ugly Face of Freedom" is puzzling. The freedom being referred to must

be the freedom from Russian rule, and so the title suggests that Ukraine would be better off

back within the Russian empire.

But Morley Safer's suggestion is inappropriate for three reasons. First, anti-Semitism is

strong in Russia and weak in Ukraine (Ukraine has no counterpart of either Pamyat or

Zhirinovksy), and so it is unclear how falling back under Russian rule would assist Ukraine in

avoiding anti-Semitism. Second, Ukraine's current problems are more rationally seen as being

the result not of too much freedom, but of too little - specifically, Ukraine's problems are the

result of continuing to be ruled by the old Communist nomenklatura that had originally been

appointed from Moscow and that presently is robbing the country blind while obstructing economic

reform. A weak economy, in turn, affects Ukrainian-Jewish relations by inviting scapegoating

from each group against the other and by promoting Jewish emigration out of Ukraine. Thus, it

is not too much freedom, but rather the absence of freedom from rule by Moscow's appointees that

most stands in the way of good Ukrainian-Jewish relations. Third, it is surprising to hear an

American objecting to freedom from slavery. Some 60 Minutes viewers will notice that Mr. Safer

objects to it on behalf of other people and not on behalf of Americans. I expect that if anyone

were to argue that American anti-Semitism or America's low quality of education or America's

high crime rate is the result of America having broken away from England, Mr. Safer would not

agree. I expect also that if England had been guilty of the horrific crimes against America

that Russia has been guilty of against Ukraine, Mr. Safer would find the suggestion odious. In

fact, Mr. Safer's suggestion is as odious to Ukrainians as would be the suggestion that Israel

would be better off under German rule would be odious to Jews. No, Mr. Safer's suggestion is

more odious - this because Berlin today is not ruled by former Nazis, whereas Moscow today is

ruled by people who just a few years ago were ardent Communists and who today continue to be

ardent imperialists.

CONTENTS:

Preface

The Galicia Division

Quality of Translation

Ukrainian Homogeneity

Were Ukrainians Nazis?

Simon Wiesenthal

What Happened in Lviv?

Nazi Propaganda Film

Collective Guilt

Paralysis of the Comparative

Function

60 Minutes' Cheap Shots

Ukrainian Anti-Semitism

Jewish Ukrainophobia

Mailbag

A Sense of Responsibility

What 60 Minutes Should Do

PostScript

Ukrainian Anti-Semitism

Is there any? Of course there is. Anti-Semitism is universal. Ukraine has some, just as does

the United States or Canada or Israel. But is there more anti-Semitism in Ukraine than

elsewhere? 60 Minutes said so - as much as said that Ukraine leads the world in anti-Semitism

but failed to provide any evidence of this, and in fact does not seem to be aware of how to go

about obtaining such evidence.

The American Jewish Committee did a better job - it sponsored a survey in 1992 about attitudes

toward Jews in the republics of the former Soviet Union, and its findings do not support 60

Minutes' allegations:

Перейти на страницу:

Похожие книги