Based on the total of anti-Jewish responses to items appearing in the

questionnaire, the rank order of the states from most hostile to least hostile

toward Jews in 1992 is as follows: Uzbekistan, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Lithuania,

Azerbaijan, Russia, Latvia, Ukraine, Moldova and Estonia. (Ukrainian Weekly,

June 21, 1992, p. 6)

Worthy of note, too, is that between 1990 and 1992, attitudes toward Jews became more negative

in all of the above republics, with the exception of Ukraine and Moldova, in which two republics

the attitudes became more positive. The failure of Ukraine to rank high on anti-Jewish

responses in this survey should have been noted by 60 Minutes, as should the improvement in

attitudes from 1990 to 1992. Instead of applauding the reality of favorable Ukrainian attitudes

toward Jews, and the reality that they are getting even better, 60 Minutes seemed bent on

encouraging their deterioration.

And, if 60 Minutes had wanted personal testimony concerning Ukrainian attitudes toward Jews to

bolster the dry facts coming from the opinion poll, then it could have consulted any number of

Ukrainian Jews who would have been happy to correct 60 Minutes' biases. The above-mentioned

Iosep Zissels, for example, would have offered observations such as that "There was a time when

the leaders of Pamiat [or "Pamyat" - the Russian anti-Semitic organization] would travel from

Russia to recruit supporters in Ukraine. They didn't find any. We are well aware of this fact"

(Ukrainian Weekly, January 26, 1992, p. 4)

CONTENTS:

Preface

The Galicia Division

Quality of Translation

Ukrainian Homogeneity

Were Ukrainians Nazis?

Simon Wiesenthal

What Happened in Lviv?

Nazi Propaganda Film

Collective Guilt

Paralysis of the Comparative

Function

60 Minutes' Cheap Shots

Ukrainian Anti-Semitism

Jewish Ukrainophobia

Mailbag

A Sense of Responsibility

What 60 Minutes Should Do

PostScript

Jewish Ukrainophobia

Is there any? Of course there is. Jewish Ukrainophobia is universal. Ukraine has some, just

as does the United States or Canada or Israel. But is there more Jewish Ukrainophobia in

Ukraine than elsewhere? Don't ask 60 Minutes - to ask such a question is to violate rules of

political correctness.

One thing missing from the above discussion of Ukrainian anti-Semitism, then, is any mention of

the reciprocal attitude of Jewish Ukrainophobia (or more generally of Jewish phobic responses

toward Gentiles or peoples of any other creed). But perhaps we would be able to evaluate

statistics on the rate of Ukrainian anti-Semitism more intelligently if we were able to put them

side by side with statistics on Jewish Ukrainophobia. If Ukrainian anti-Semitism shows a

declining trend over some interval, would this fact not be enriched by a comparison with the

trend of Jewish Ukrainophobia over the same interval? In a discussion of Ukrainian-Jewish

relations, how is it conceivable that the attitudes of Ukrainians toward Jews is deemed relevant

and susceptible to quantification, but the attitudes of Jews toward Ukrainians is not? Here, as

in several other instances above, we see a curious paralysis of the comparative function, a

puzzling Ukrainian passivity in allowing the Jewish side to set the agenda for discussion and to

limit its parameters. Ukrainian motes are put under the microscope and measured and analyzed,

but Jewish beams are not.

CONTENTS:

Preface

The Galicia Division

Quality of Translation

Ukrainian Homogeneity

Were Ukrainians Nazis?

Simon Wiesenthal

What Happened in Lviv?

Nazi Propaganda Film

Collective Guilt

Paralysis of the Comparative

Function

60 Minutes' Cheap Shots

Ukrainian Anti-Semitism

Jewish Ukrainophobia

Mailbag

A Sense of Responsibility

What 60 Minutes Should Do

PostScript

Mailbag

60 Minutes' Mailbag comment on October 30, 1994 - the Sunday following the original The Ugly

Face of Freedom broadcast - was inadequate. It failed to retract or correct any of the

misinformation noted above. It failed to present the other side of the story. It continued to

pour fuel on the fire.

Of what possible relevance is it that - as 60 Minutes reports a letter as saying - a fraction of

Ukrainians refuses to admit that they collaborated with the Nazis? Possibly, some minuscule

fraction does irrationally refuse to admit this (60 Minutes offered no data, of course) - but so

what? The same might be true of every other group. Possibly some minuscule fraction of Jews

irrationally refuses to admit that Jews collaborated with the Nazis (I don't have any data

either), and yet 60 Minutes does not seem to find the existence of this group noteworthy enough

to broadcast.

The following Sunday, November 6, 1994, 60 Minutes continued to focus on the Ukrainian reaction

to the original broadcast, but without correction, without retraction, without apology. 60

Minutes is willing to go as far as admitting that Ukrainians are upset, but not as far as

divulging that the cause of that upset is irresponsible and negligent reporting.

As of November 21, 1997, 60 Minutes has not broadcast any correction or retraction or apology.

CONTENTS:

Preface

Перейти на страницу:

Похожие книги