primary motive and that the stated purpose of working for imperial federation was, to
some extent at least, a mask.
(September 1940, XXX, 743-746) attributes its foundation to this cause as follows:
"German ambitions to destroy and supplant the British Commonwealth were manifest to
those who had eyes to see.... [These asked] 'Can not all the Dominions he brought to
realize the common danger that confronts them as much as it confronts Great Britain and
think out in mutual discussion the means of uniting all the force and resolution of the
Empire in its defense?' To the solution of this question the founders of the Closer Union
Societies resolved to apply a similar procedure. Round Table Groups were established in
all the British Dominions to study the problem." A similar cause for the founding
appeared in
2. The original leader of the Round Table Groups in New Zealand was apparently
James Allen (Sir James after 1917), who had been educated in England, at Clifton School
and Cambridge University, and was an M. P. in New Zealand from 1887 to 1920. He was
Minister of Defense (1912-1920), Minister of Finance and Education (1912-1915), and
Minister of Finance (1919-1920), before he became in 1920, New Zealand's High
Commissioner in London. He was a member of the Royal Institute of International
Affairs.
In the Round Table Group for New Zealand, Allen was soon supplemented and
eventually succeeded by William Downie-Stewart as the most important member.
Stewart was at the time Mayor of Dunedin (1913) but soon began a twenty-one-year
period as an M.P. (1914-1935). He was also Minister of Customs (1921-1928); Minister
of Internal Affairs (1921-1924); Minister of Industries and Commerce (1923-1926);
Attorney General (1926); Minister of Finance (1926-1928, 1931-1933); Acting Prime
Minister (1926); New Zealand delegate to the Ottawa Conference (1932); Vice-
Chancellor of Otago University; prominent businessman, and president of the New
Zealand Institute of International Affairs (1935- ). According to Dove's letters, he
attended a Milner Group discussion meeting at Lord Lothian's country house in October
1932.
3. The chief leaders in Australia were Thomas Bavin (Sir Thomas after 1933) and
Frederic W. Eggleston (Sir Frederic since 1941). The former, who died in 1941 (see
obituary in
from 1897, Professor of Law and Modern History at the University of Tasmania (1900-
1901); private secretary to the first Prime Minister of Australia, Sir Edmund Barton, in
1901-1904; Secretary and Chief Law Officer of Australia in 1907; It. commander in
naval intelligence in 1916-1918; an Australian M.P. in 1919-1935; held many cabinet
posts in New South Wales from 1922 to 1930, ending as Premier (1927-1930). He
finished his career as a judge of the Supreme Court in 1935-1941. He was one of the
original members of the Round Table Group in Australia, a regular contributor to
Affairs.
Eggleston was a barrister from 1897; a member, correspondent, and chief agent in
Australia for
Australia, (1920-1927); Minister for Railways, (1924-1926); chairman of the
Commonwealth Grants Commission, (1934-1941); Minister of China (1941-1944) and to
the United States (1944-1946). He was one of the founders and chief officers of the
Australian Institute of International Affairs and its representative on the council of the
Institute of Pacific Relations.
4. Glazebrook, although virtually unknown, was a very important figure in Canadian
life, especially in financial and imperialist circles, up to his death in 1940. For many
years he had a practical monopoly in foreign exchange transactions in Toronto, through
his firm, Glazebrook and Cronyn (founded 1900). Like most members of the Milner
Group, he was interested in adult education, workers' education, and university
management. He promoted all of these in Toronto, lecturing himself to the Workers'
Educational Association, and at the University of Toronto where he was assistant
Professor of Banking and Finance (1926-1937). He was the chief adviser of leading
bankers of Canada, and of London and New York bankers on Canadian matters.
one time a wide acquaintance among the prominent figures in British public life, and it is
well-known to his intimates that on numerous occasions British ministers, anxious to
secure reliable information about certain Canadian affairs through unofficial channels,
had recourse of Glazebrook.... By precept and example he exercised an immense
influence for good upon the characters and outlook of a number of young Canadians who